minutes
Minutes-7 /27/1990
Dated June 27, 1990City Council — regular meeting, July 27, 1990 9 pages
Ord. 1990-167, Res. 1990-005
Page 5 of 9
Text read by the vision model; check the PDF for anything that matters.Scheetz: How many homes on the north side were damaged?
Clerk: I know of eighteen (18) homms plus the sub station and crop damages.
Potter: Some of them sustained damage from sewer backup.
Bartels: I don't know what to do.
Slaymaker: There's nothing wrong with requiring things to be built one foot above the flood plain level. The ones that were not damaged this time could stay where they are.
Greenleaf: The ordinance would apply to any trailer which received more than 50% damage.
Bartels: Go back to the others?
Greenleaf: Fifty percent of value.
Scheetz: We have 49 structures with 55 living units. One is vacant now so 54 are occupied.
Morgan: How many received 50% damage?
Scheetz: That depends upon the people you talk to. Twelve trailers had damage to the floor.
Bartels: Not that many then.
Scheetz: Most were at the right height. Some were damaged pretty bad. Still determining damage.
Bartels: How old.
Scheetz: It's not the age that counts. It's the condition of the trailer and what was in them.
Brown: An old trailer might be worth $7,000.00. It wouldn't take much for $3,500.00 damage.
Slaymaker: Are personal belongings counted in the 50% figure?
Greenleaf: No.
Brown: Replacing an entire flood would be costly.
Morgan: Are they all privately owned?
Scheetz: Yes. I don't own any of them.
Sources
- laserfiche: Minutes-7 /27/1990 (Minutes-7 -27-1990.pdf) — where it was found ↗ first seen Oct 12, 2026
Data last updated October 15, 2026. Built from the archive's documents; see how the data is built.