minutes
Minutes-07/24/2013
Dated July 24, 2013City Council — regular meeting, July 24, 2013 7 pages
Ord. 2013-322, Ord. 2013-319, Ord. 2013-333, Ord. 2013-334, Ord. 2013-335, Res. 2013-135, Res. 2013-136, Res. 2013-137, Res. 2013-138, Res. 2013-139, Res. 2013-140, Res. 2013-141, Res. 2013-142, Res. 2013-143, Res. 2013-144, Res. 2013-145, Res. 2013-146
Page 1 of 7
Text from the PDF text layer; check the PDF for anything that matters. City of.Tiffin, Iowa
Tiffin Regular City; Council Meeting
j. ,
Wednesday, July 24, 2013 at 6: 30 PM
Springmier Library in CCA Middle School, Tiffin, Iowa
The Tiffin City Council met in regular session on Wednesday, July 24, 2013 at the Springmier
Library.
I. Call to Order and Roil Call
Mayor Berner called the meeting to order at 6: 33 PM
Members, present: Jim Bartels, Joan Kehler, Royce Phillips, Mike Ryan and Peggy Upton
Members` absent: None.
Also present: Engineer Frederick, Attorney Raiber, Deputy City Clerk Goedken
II. Agenda
Motion by Ryan to approve the agenda, seconded by Bartels. A yes: All - Nays: None.
Motion carried.
Ill. Community/ Citizen Forum
Berner stated that he was contacted by resident Dick Huff over in Songbird Estates - large
loose animal, probably a dog; wanted the Council to know. -
A.
Contract Management Companies for City Hall
Two companies given the opportunity to present to Council, Pointe Builders and Woodruff.
Construction. Pointe Builders do not have the time and have pulled out. Nick Woodruff of
Woodruff Construction. Presentation given to Council members and Woodruff talked through
each section of the presentation. Discussion on prior projects' ofWoodruff Construction.
Woodruff stating local interest and interest in further growth that the construction of City Hall
will bring to Tiffin. Would have the building enclosed by fall and finished by January. Costs
are associated with the drawings that Woodruff has been given. Cannot guarantee that there
will not be additional costs incurred. Mayor Berner asks for a summary of the benefits of a
construction management company versus putting it out forbid. Woodruff stated that there is
someone that is more accountable from the start.
Upton asked if Woodruff would doing any
sub work. Woodruff stated that they would provide management only, there would be a
supervisor on site and the direct involvement would be paperwork. Breakdown given on what
individual parts would be bid out. Berner asked if the bids came in higher than anticipated,
would Woodruff bring options to the Council as how to bring down the costs. Woodruff stated
that they would work with the contractor. Percent is 3. 5% plus set fees based on time of the
project. Bid is based on 3 months from groundbreaking to finish, Woodruff would cap the set
fees for 3 months. Upton stated that the quick math comes up to around $ 50, 000, would the
company the City more money than they cost. Woodruff stated that there wouldn' t be
save
higher direct savings, but the indirect costs of management and meetings would be
essentially a wash. - Discussion on the bidding procese difference between contract
management company and traditional. Berner asked if there is a list that Woodruff pulls from,
or if Council would suggest someone, would they be asking that company for bids.. Woodruff
stated input is highly accepted, but cannot deny anyone.
IV. Public Hearings
Sources
- laserfiche: Minutes-07/24/2013 (Minutes-07-24-2013.pdf) — where it was found ↗ first seen Oct 12, 2026
Data last updated October 15, 2026. Built from the archive's documents; see how the data is built.