Discussion and Consideration of OPD Site District, Park Place City Center – Part One, Phase Seven, Lots 9-14 – Marvin Gardens — Marvin Gardens Engineering Notes

7. Display lighting levels along the eastern property line of lots 97, 98, and 99 on the western side of the trail (west side of the site). Lighting levels shall meet Table 2 of Section 8 of the City Development Code of Ordinances. Updated photometrics will be provided when available. 8. On numerous sheets, purple X’s show up near intakes but there is nothing in the legend to reflect what these are/ Identify the purple X’s on a specific sheet legend or remove if undesired throughout the plan set. X’s have been removed. 9. Concept drawings show each building as 65 units, a mix of studio, 1 bedroom, and 2 bedrooms. Plans show 63 units, with a different mix of 1 bedrooms and 2 bedrooms. Verify which is accurate and update accordingly. Current plans have 63 units. Updated architectural plans are in the process of being completed. They will be provided when available. 10. Per the district description, 567 parking spaces are required on site. Plans show 412 parking spaces provided on site, which does not meet the district descriptions. Modify as necessary. a. Plans show 144 spaces off site. Clarify where this off site parking is located. b. Plans show 43 on-street parking spaces. Clarify where this is located. An additional plan sheet has been added to show parking layout throughout the development. 11. Identify if any utilities will be public, note this on the plans. Utilities will be private. A note has been added. 12. Verify FDC connections meet code. It appears buildings 10 & 13 FDC are further than 100 ft from site hydrant. Modify as necessary. FDC locations have been revised. Traffic Impact Analysis 13. The Marvin Gardens site plan mentions the inclusion of a restaurant. This was not mentioned within the TIS. Has this been removed from the plans? a. If the restaurant is still valid, the TIS should be updated to incorporate the land use. i. There will be no restaurant at Marvin Gardens OPD. Confirmed. 14. Overall, we generally agree with the conclusions and recommendations of the TIS. If the restaurant is no longer part of the development, please refer to the below comments. b. MMS noted that the below will be addressed during the Marvin Gardens OPD Submittal. Acknowledged. c. We agree with the TIS’s distribution used for the Andersen Addition Traffic. The TIS text referring to a recommended application of 70% of all traffic utilizing Bailey Way was in reference to development along