minutes
Minutes-9 /28/1983
Page 5 of 9
Text read by the vision model; check the PDF for anything that matters.Potter: The P & Z Commission will confer about the watershed. I have no qualms about what our P & Z can do.
Rohret: Why wasn't it done before?
Spivey: This is my question, too. Why don't we have more information. The watershed will be a problem. We don't want a lift station that the town has to take care of. If we annex now and then try later to do something, it might not work that way.
Chris Rohret: It makes sense that we need more controls. The Council and P & Z should set the controls before it is annexed. We need more detailed plans first.
Bechtoldt: You will annex it as agricultural land and before anything is done, rezoning has to occur.
Chris Rohret: Does it make sense to annex it all and then rezone it part by part at our own rate?
Stoffer: It makes a lot of sense.
Potter: The Council can't do anything until the P & Z meets.
Spivey: After it is annexed, how much control will the city have?
Potter: It is annexed as agricultural, not residential.
Rohret: But the direct assumption is there that it will be developed.
Brown: That's true of any subdivision. It takes approval first.
Chris Rohret: It's the large area that scares people.
Brown: The problem is the size. That's a lot of ground. Could we work it down to something smaller? I know the 131 acres follows the fringe area study. It is slated for growth. Couldn't we work together for a smaller area?
Stoffer: We have a lot of flexibility.
Brown: People I've talked to are concerned about the amount of ground. It would be nice to see it all plotted out. But like you say, you could be throwing away a lot of money for nothing. But if it isn't like it's supposed to be, the P & Z won't approve it. All we're voting on tonight is the amount of land and whether to annex it. Everything to come will have to go through the P & Z Commission.
Potter: I'm sure that Grace and the P&Z will work together. The lift station is not a good idea.
Brown: The newspaper reported that the cost to the city would be streets and sidewalks. Our subdivision ordinance makes the developer pay for the streets and sidewalks.
Stoffer: The cost is to the developer. The city has virtually no cost.
Brown: Any engineering inspections will also be paid by the developer.
Sources
- laserfiche: Minutes-9 /28/1983 (Minutes-9 -28-1983.pdf) — where it was found ↗ first seen Oct 12, 2026
Data last updated October 15, 2026. Built from the archive's documents; see how the data is built.