Page 3 of 9

Text read by the vision model; check the PDF for anything that matters.
Minutes July 8, 1986 Stoffer: We could keep that in mind when laying grades. Potter: Who is responsible for septic tanks? Stoffer: Homeowners. Potter: If council requires hookups to sewer later, who pays for it, and who puts it in? Morgan: Will this cause excess runoff in creek by Summerhays Street? Stoffer: There will be a minimal amount of paving with a lot of vegetation. The lots will be three-four times size of normal lots. This would minimize the run-off. When the east side of Roberts Ferry Road is developed we could create a dam or storm sewer. The land in question falls toward the east. There would be more run-off from farming the area. We would not do anything to increase that. Hart: You could look at a holding pond. Morhan: Is this in the plans? Stoffer: We are sensitive to this consideration. Morgan: Will you build the houses? Stoffer: We will probably sell empty lots. Might build houses if lots don't sell. Flansburg: Why wasn't this all discussed when the land was annexed? Stevens: The only change is the size of the lots. He is proposing larger lots with fewer streets. Stoffer: We've rejected idea of short-term lift-station. You will be upgrading sewer system regardless of this development. Potter: We have a subdivision ordinance and the council did go through all this, at length, with Bill before. Stoffer: We will price the lots with the septic tank. Kern: Does the state allow septic tanks or do property owners have to hook into existing line if one is available within a short distance? Stoffer: If sewer becomes available, they must hook up. If one is not available, they can use septic tanks. County Health Dept. has already given approval. Hart: City has a sand well and state puts 1,000 or 1,500 foot limitation on distance of septic tanks from sand well.

Sources

This document's details as JSON

Data last updated October 15, 2026. Built from the archive's documents; see how the data is built.