staff report memo · K-4
Discussion and Consideration to Approve sending out an RFQ for the Tiffin Fire Station Project and Council Action as Needed — K-4
Page 13 of 15
Text from the PDF text layer; check the PDF for anything that matters.3 Good/Adequate
2 Below Expectations
1 Poor
0 Does Not Address Criterion
Evaluators may use the following calculation:
Weighted Score = (Rating ÷ 5) × Available Points
Example: A rating of 4 on a 25-point criterion would result in:
4 ÷ 5 × 25 = 20 points
X. CONTRACT NEGOTIATION
Following completion of the evaluation process, the City intends to begin negotiations with the
highest-ranked firm regarding the scope, schedule, and compensation for the services to be
provided.
The initial contract may address site evaluation and planning services. At the City's discretion,
subsequent phases of architectural and engineering services may be authorized through
amendments, additional agreements, or other appropriate contracting mechanisms.
The City does not guarantee that all services identified in this RFQ will be authorized.
XI. CITY RIGHTS
The City reserves the right to:
• Reject any or all Statements of Qualifications.
• Request clarification or additional information.
• Modify or amend this RFQ.
• Cancel the RFQ process.
• Conduct interviews.
• Select a firm based upon qualifications.
• Negotiate with the highest-ranked firm.
• Terminate negotiations with any firm.
• Negotiate with the next highest-ranked firm if an agreement cannot be reached.
• Modify the scope of services.
• Award only those services determined to be in the City's best interest.
11
Sources
- revize: K-4 (jGBDXz8QFK6wqWTYyhIFgOFNlwHfvr.pdf) — where it was found ↗ first seen Oct 12, 2026
Attached to agenda item: K-4 Discussion and Consideration to Approve sending out an RFQ for the Tiffin Fire Station...
Data last updated October 15, 2026. Built from the archive's documents; see how the data is built.