Page 3 of 5
Text read by the vision model; check the PDF for anything that matters.except as permitted by the council, which permission shall only be granted if reasonable cause exists for the permit holder failing to remove the building from the street, alley, or sidewalk within the time limit.
SECTION 10. Compliance with State Law. Anyone to whom a permit for moving a building is issued shall comply with all requirements of state laws for moving oversized loads.
SECTION 11. Penalty. Anyone violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall, upon conviction, be subject to imprisonment not exceeding thirty (30) days or to a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100.00). Whenever the fine and costs imposed for the violation of this Ordinance are not paid, the person convicted may be committed to jail until the fine and costs are paid, not to exceed thirty (30) days.
SECTION 12. Repealer. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed.
SECTION 13. Saving Clause. If any section, provision or part of this ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole, or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 14. When Effective. This Ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication as provided by law.
The foregoing ordinance entitled AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE MOVING OF BUILDINGS ALONG OR OVER THE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND PRESCRIBING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION was published on the 12th day of August, 1982 by posting copies thereof in three public places within the limits, two of which places are the mayor's office and the post office.
ADELIA S. KERN, CLERK-TREASURER
Councilman Stevens introduced the foregoing Ordinance which was then read and duly considered by the Council. Its adoption was moved by Councilman Cox and seconded by Councilman Spivey.
On roll call vote Councilman Cox, Brown, Spivey, Rohret, Stevens voted "Aye". ______ voted "Nay".
Whereupon the Mayor declared the motion carried. Council man Cox then moved that the rule or law requiring three readings of this Ordinance on three different dates be dispensed with. On roll
Sources
- laserfiche: Ordinances-1982-106 (Ordinances-1982-106.pdf) — where it was found ↗ first seen Oct 12, 2026
Data last updated October 15, 2026. Built from the archive's documents; see how the data is built.